Male-Female Frienships in Kinda Baboons and Subsequent Connotations
In class, we have discussed the nuances of placing human attributes onto primates, specifically in the context of primate rights in research studies. First, these findings do suggest a male-female friendship-esque social function with these primates. However, there is issue with ascribing human concepts and emotions to primates; it could lead to these behaviors being misinterpreted due to an emotional human bias. In addition, I think this study has interesting implications for the research world. For example, just how similar do primates have to be to humans behaviorally for people to possibly start considering more restrictions on their use in research? I could see this occurring due to the results of this study.
Male-female platonic friendships are very humanized behaviors which carry a lot of emotion for people due to our own individual experiences and connotations with the term. Finding
primates who exhibit these behaviors could revise our feelings toward their “humanity” as described in the Aguilera study which could have interesting consequences for both research and general viewpoints.
References
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/kinda-baboons-male-female-friendships
https://neprimateconservancy.org/kinda-baboon/
https://phys.org/news/2025-02-kinder-gentler-social-life-kinda.html

Comments
Post a Comment